The analysis of informal activities in street space of Semarang’s Chinatown, Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Published:
Aug 1, 2022
Keywords:
Activity, Outdoor living room, Pecinan Semarang, Sense of place, Street space
Main Article Content
Abstract
The informal aspect of daily activities plays a role in shaping the quality of urban architectural design. This is due to the fact that public open space has become a place for all community-based informal activities, thereby, making the public-private sphere a collective spectrum and using the outdoor as a common space for all. These activities, however, have the ability to create a sense of belonging to the urban community towards a place even though they are temporary. An example of this is the Semarang Chinatown area which is a street space being used as a living outdoor space (sense of place). Therefore, this study was conducted to understand the character of the outdoor living room in the street space through the sense of place dimension. This involved using qualitative methods through field observation data to identify the place identity, place attachment, and place dependence. The findings showed that the informal activities reviewed through the sense of place dimension shape the character of the outdoor living room in the street space and this is expected to increase the quality of the street as a public open space in the Semarang Chinatown area.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Dwisusanto , Yohanes Basuki, and Christin Purnamasari Nusaputra. 2022. “The Analysis of Informal Activities in Street Space of Semarang’s Chinatown, Indonesia”. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 7 (2), 155-62. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v7i2.1182.
Section
ARTICLES-RESEARCH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
BAPPEDA Kota Semarang. 2011. Peraturan Daerah Kota Semarang Nomor 14 Tahun 2011 Tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Semarang Tahun 2011-2031. Indonesia. http://jdih.semarangkota.go.id/ildis_v2/public/pencarian/499/detail.
Choironi, Rosida. 2004. ‘Karakteristik Ruang Gang Baru Pecinan Semarang’. Univeristas Diponegoro. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/12016/1/2004MTA3192.pdf.
Dinas Penataan Ruang Kota Semarang. 2020. ‘One Map Semarang’. Distaru.Semarangkota.Go.Id. 2020. https://distaru.semarangkota.go.id/semarang/index.php?webgis=tataruang.
Fauzi, Akhmad Fais, and Lita Sari Barus. 2019. ‘Identifikasi Faktor Fisik Penentu Daya Hidup Ruang Jalan (Livable Streets)’. Jakarta. https://digilib.esaunggul.ac.id/UEU-Research-16_0281/12925/livable-streets.
Francis, Jacinta, Billie Giles-Corti, Lisa Wood, and Matthew Knuiman. 2012. ‘Creating Sense of Community: The Role of Public Space’. Journal of Environmental Psychology 32 (4): 401–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.07.002.
Han, Wang, and Jia Beisi. 2015. ‘A Morphological Study of Traditional Shophouse in China and Southeast Asia’. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 179 (April): 237–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.427.
Handinoto. 1999. ‘Lingkungan “Pecinan” Dalam Tata Ruang Kota Di Jawa Pada Masa Kolonial’. DIMENSI (Jounal of Architecture and Buit Environment) 27 (1): 20–29. https://dimensi.petra.ac.id/index.php/ars/article/view/15704.
Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team. 2019. ‘Atlas Infrastruktur Kota Semarang’. OpenStreetMap.Id. 2019. https://openstreetmap.id/kota-semarang/.
Jorgensen, Bradley S., and Richard C. Stedman. 2001. ‘Sense of Place as an Attitude: Lakeshore Owners Attitudes toward Their Properties’. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21 (3): 233–48. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0226.
Kamalipour, Hesam. 2020. ‘Improvising Places: The Fluidity of Space in Informal Settlements’. Sustainability 12 (6): 2293. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062293.
Kohl, David. 1984. Chinese Architecture in the Straits Settlements and Western Malaya: Temples, Kongsis, and Houses. Kuala Lumpur: Heinemann Asia.
Lake, Reginaldo Christophori, Yohanes Basuki Dwisusanto, Yohanes Djarot Purbadi, and Fransiscus Xaverius Eddy Arinto. 2020. ‘Fenomena The Sacred Public Space Berdasarkan Teori Lefebvre “The Production of Space” Studi Kasus: Ruang Publik Kota Larantuka Sebagai Citra Kota Reinha Rosari’. Jurnal Arsitektur ARCADE 4 (2): 85. https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v4i2.452.
Liem, Thian Joe. 1931. Riwayat Semarang. Semarang: Hasta Wahana.
Lydon, Mike, Anthony Garcia, and Andres Duany. 2015. Tactical Urbanism: Short-Term Action for Long-Term Change. Washington DC: Island Press.
Madanipour, Ali. 2010. Whose Public Space? Whose Public Space? International Case Studies in Urban Design and Development. London: Routledge.
———. 2017. Cities in Time: Temporary Urbanism and the Future of the City. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Meneses-Reyes, Rodrigo, and José A Caballero-Juárez. 2014. ‘The Right to Work on the Street: Public Space and Constitutional Rights’. Planning Theory 13 (4): 370–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213503967.
Micek, Michał, and Sylwia Staszewska. 2019. ‘Urban and Rural Public Spaces: Development Issues and Qualitative Assessment’. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series 45 (45): 75–93. https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2019-0025.
Nusaputra, Christin Purnamasari, and Yohanes Basuki Dwisusanto. 2022. ‘Fragmentation of Street Space Usage in Chinatown Village Semarang, Indonesia’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 7 (1): 33–42. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v7i1.1181.
Pratiwo. 2010. Arsitektur Tradisional Tionghoa Dan Perkembangan Kota. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
Purwanto, L. M. F. 2005. ‘Kota Kolonial Lama Semarang (Tinjauan Umum Sejarah Perkembangan Arsitektur Kota)’. DIMENSI: Journal of Architecture and Built Environment 33 (1). https://dimensi.petra.ac.id/index.php/ars/article/view/16273.
Rosiana, Maria. 2002. ‘Kajian Pola Morfologi Ruang Kawasan Pecinan (Studi Kasus : Kawasan Pecinan Semarang)’. Universitas Diponegoro. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/12144/1/2002MTA2026.pdf.
Samadi, Zalina, Dasimah Omar, and Rodzyah Mohd Yunus. 2012. ‘On-Street Visual Analysis on Outdoor Space of Jalan Hang Jebat, Melaka’. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 68 (December): 353–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.233.
Ujang, Norsidah, and Kamariah Dola. 2007. ‘Linking Activity and Place Attachment Dimensions in Enhancing the Sense of Place’. ALAM CIPTA, International Journal on Sustainable Tropical Design Research & Practice 2 (1): 59–67. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/12221758.pdf.
Waroeng Semawis Semarang. 2019. ‘Semawis Semarang’. Instagram. 2019. https://www.instagram.com/p/ByP7plapxiF/.
Widodo, Johannes, Abang Winarwan, and Harastoeti Dibyo Hartanto. 1989. ‘Kota Sebagai Obyek Arsitektur (Dengan Kota Semarang Sebagai Studi Kasus)’. Bandung. https://repository.unpar.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/5366/KTI_Johannes_Kota Sebagai Obyek-p.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Choironi, Rosida. 2004. ‘Karakteristik Ruang Gang Baru Pecinan Semarang’. Univeristas Diponegoro. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/12016/1/2004MTA3192.pdf.
Dinas Penataan Ruang Kota Semarang. 2020. ‘One Map Semarang’. Distaru.Semarangkota.Go.Id. 2020. https://distaru.semarangkota.go.id/semarang/index.php?webgis=tataruang.
Fauzi, Akhmad Fais, and Lita Sari Barus. 2019. ‘Identifikasi Faktor Fisik Penentu Daya Hidup Ruang Jalan (Livable Streets)’. Jakarta. https://digilib.esaunggul.ac.id/UEU-Research-16_0281/12925/livable-streets.
Francis, Jacinta, Billie Giles-Corti, Lisa Wood, and Matthew Knuiman. 2012. ‘Creating Sense of Community: The Role of Public Space’. Journal of Environmental Psychology 32 (4): 401–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.07.002.
Han, Wang, and Jia Beisi. 2015. ‘A Morphological Study of Traditional Shophouse in China and Southeast Asia’. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 179 (April): 237–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.427.
Handinoto. 1999. ‘Lingkungan “Pecinan” Dalam Tata Ruang Kota Di Jawa Pada Masa Kolonial’. DIMENSI (Jounal of Architecture and Buit Environment) 27 (1): 20–29. https://dimensi.petra.ac.id/index.php/ars/article/view/15704.
Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team. 2019. ‘Atlas Infrastruktur Kota Semarang’. OpenStreetMap.Id. 2019. https://openstreetmap.id/kota-semarang/.
Jorgensen, Bradley S., and Richard C. Stedman. 2001. ‘Sense of Place as an Attitude: Lakeshore Owners Attitudes toward Their Properties’. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21 (3): 233–48. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0226.
Kamalipour, Hesam. 2020. ‘Improvising Places: The Fluidity of Space in Informal Settlements’. Sustainability 12 (6): 2293. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062293.
Kohl, David. 1984. Chinese Architecture in the Straits Settlements and Western Malaya: Temples, Kongsis, and Houses. Kuala Lumpur: Heinemann Asia.
Lake, Reginaldo Christophori, Yohanes Basuki Dwisusanto, Yohanes Djarot Purbadi, and Fransiscus Xaverius Eddy Arinto. 2020. ‘Fenomena The Sacred Public Space Berdasarkan Teori Lefebvre “The Production of Space” Studi Kasus: Ruang Publik Kota Larantuka Sebagai Citra Kota Reinha Rosari’. Jurnal Arsitektur ARCADE 4 (2): 85. https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v4i2.452.
Liem, Thian Joe. 1931. Riwayat Semarang. Semarang: Hasta Wahana.
Lydon, Mike, Anthony Garcia, and Andres Duany. 2015. Tactical Urbanism: Short-Term Action for Long-Term Change. Washington DC: Island Press.
Madanipour, Ali. 2010. Whose Public Space? Whose Public Space? International Case Studies in Urban Design and Development. London: Routledge.
———. 2017. Cities in Time: Temporary Urbanism and the Future of the City. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Meneses-Reyes, Rodrigo, and José A Caballero-Juárez. 2014. ‘The Right to Work on the Street: Public Space and Constitutional Rights’. Planning Theory 13 (4): 370–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213503967.
Micek, Michał, and Sylwia Staszewska. 2019. ‘Urban and Rural Public Spaces: Development Issues and Qualitative Assessment’. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series 45 (45): 75–93. https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2019-0025.
Nusaputra, Christin Purnamasari, and Yohanes Basuki Dwisusanto. 2022. ‘Fragmentation of Street Space Usage in Chinatown Village Semarang, Indonesia’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 7 (1): 33–42. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v7i1.1181.
Pratiwo. 2010. Arsitektur Tradisional Tionghoa Dan Perkembangan Kota. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
Purwanto, L. M. F. 2005. ‘Kota Kolonial Lama Semarang (Tinjauan Umum Sejarah Perkembangan Arsitektur Kota)’. DIMENSI: Journal of Architecture and Built Environment 33 (1). https://dimensi.petra.ac.id/index.php/ars/article/view/16273.
Rosiana, Maria. 2002. ‘Kajian Pola Morfologi Ruang Kawasan Pecinan (Studi Kasus : Kawasan Pecinan Semarang)’. Universitas Diponegoro. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/12144/1/2002MTA2026.pdf.
Samadi, Zalina, Dasimah Omar, and Rodzyah Mohd Yunus. 2012. ‘On-Street Visual Analysis on Outdoor Space of Jalan Hang Jebat, Melaka’. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 68 (December): 353–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.233.
Ujang, Norsidah, and Kamariah Dola. 2007. ‘Linking Activity and Place Attachment Dimensions in Enhancing the Sense of Place’. ALAM CIPTA, International Journal on Sustainable Tropical Design Research & Practice 2 (1): 59–67. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/12221758.pdf.
Waroeng Semawis Semarang. 2019. ‘Semawis Semarang’. Instagram. 2019. https://www.instagram.com/p/ByP7plapxiF/.
Widodo, Johannes, Abang Winarwan, and Harastoeti Dibyo Hartanto. 1989. ‘Kota Sebagai Obyek Arsitektur (Dengan Kota Semarang Sebagai Studi Kasus)’. Bandung. https://repository.unpar.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/5366/KTI_Johannes_Kota Sebagai Obyek-p.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.