Understanding place attachment in temporary public space through noematic-noetic synthesis
Article Sidebar
Published:
Aug 1, 2022
Keywords:
Noema noesis, Place attachment, Public space, Ramadan street market, Temporary
Main Article Content
Abstract
To create a successful temporary public space that can sustain in dealing with the contemporary changes, particularly during this pandemic era which is full of uncertainty, the degree of people’s attachment to that place should be maintained. It is simply because the more the public space is needed, the more users will use the space, and a sense of belonging will grow to help maintain its sustainability afterward. The temporality aspect of time, nevertheless, can affect the growth of a person’s place attachment. Using Husserl’s phenomenological analysis of noema and noesis, this qualitative study intends to understand the place attachment development in one of the notorious temporary public spaces in Indonesia, a Ramadan street market, particularly in Batam. Direct observation and semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect the data regarding the theoretical framework of place attachment obtained from the literature review. This study reveals that, through the noematic synthesis, the external dimensions (physical characteristic) most likely lead to functional attachment or place dependence. Whilst through the noetic synthesis, the psychological attachment or place identity of the temporary public space can be influenced by the internal dimensions of place attachment (social intercourse, social cohesion, and social symbol).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Aguspriyanti, Carissa Dinar. 2022. “Understanding Place Attachment in Temporary Public Space through Noematic-Noetic Synthesis”. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 7 (2), 197-204. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v7i2.1402.
Section
ARTICLES-RESEARCH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Carmona, Matthew. 2019. ‘Principles for Public Space Design, Planning to Do Better’. URBAN DESIGN International 24 (1): 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-018-0070-3.
———. 2021. Public Places Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315158457.
Lake, Reginaldo Chistophori. 2020. ‘Architecture as a Relation of Doing and Being’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 5 (3): 329–30. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i3.665.
Lesmana, Diyan, Antariksa, Lisa Dwi Wulandari, and Herry Santosa. 2021. ‘Senses of Place in Lawas Maspati Village Community at Surabaya: Exploration Study towards Physical, Social, and Cultural Factors’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 6 (1): 67–74. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i1.595.
Paukaeva, Anastasiia A., Tsuyoshi Setoguchi, Norihiro Watanabe, and Vera I. Luchkova. 2020. ‘Temporary Design on Public Open Space for Improving the Pedestrian’s Perception Using Social Media Images in Winter Cities’. Sustainability 12 (15): 6062. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156062.
Peng, Jianchao, Dirk Strijker, and Qun Wu. 2020. ‘Place Identity: How Far Have We Come in Exploring Its Meanings?’ Frontiers in Psychology 11 (March). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00294.
Pradono, Budi. 2019. ‘The Interiority of Proximity Between Nature and Architecture in Contemporary and Tropically Context with Cases Studies’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 3 (2): 129–44. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v3i2.63.
Purwanto, Edi, and Arnis Rochma Harani. 2020. ‘Understanding the Place Attachment and Place Identity in Public Space through the Ability of Community Mental Map’. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 402 (1): 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/402/1/012024.
Qazimi, Shukran. 2014. ‘Sense of Place and Place Identity’. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research 1 (1): 306. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v1i1.p306-310.
Ramadhani, Annisa Nur, Muhammad Faqih, and Arina Hayati. 2018. ‘Inhabitant’S Sense of Place in the Context of Tourism Kampung’. Journal of Architecture&ENVIRONMENT 17 (2): 151. https://doi.org/10.12962/j2355262x.v17i2.a3894.
Rassi, Fatemeh, and Zeiae Shahabi. 2015. ‘Husserl’s Phenomenology and Two Terms of Noema and Noesis’. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 53 (June): 29–34. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.53.29.
Redyantanu, Bramasta Putra, and Rully Damayanti. 2017. ‘Temporality in a Discussion of Sustainable Architecture’. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment) 44 (2). https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.44.2.163-170.
Sastrosasmito, Sudaryono. 2020. ‘Arsitektur Sebagai Realitas Kemanusiaan (Dari Keseharian Sampai Kesadaran Transendental)’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 5 (2): 141–42. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i2.531.
Scannell, Leila, and Robert Gifford. 2010. ‘Defining Place Attachment: A Tripartite Organizing Framework’. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006.
Schmidt, Stefan W. 2020. ‘Body and Place as the Noetic-Noematic Structure of Geographical Experience’. Research in Phenomenology 50 (2): 261–81. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691640-12341450.
Smaldone, David. 2006. ‘The Role of Time in Place Attachment’. Methods, 47–56. http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_nrs-P-14.pdf#page=56.
Stedman, Richard C. 2003. ‘Sense of Place and Forest Science: Toward a Program of Quantitative Research’. Forest Science 49 (6): 822–29. https://tot.unm.edu/assets/docs/stedman2003_sop_forsci.pdf.
Sudradjat, Iwan. 2020. ‘Teori Dalam Penelitian Arsitektur’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 5 (1): i–vi. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i1.378.
Sulistiani, Melinda, and Rully Damayanti. 2018. ‘Studi Temporalitas Ruang Terhadap Place Attachment: Kasus Pada Kafe Di Koridor Jalan Mayjend Yono Soewoyo, Surabaya’. Jurnal EDimensi Arsitektur 6 (1): 409–16. https://publication.petra.ac.id/index.php/teknik-arsitektur/article/view/8458/7653.
Ujang, Norsidah, and Khalilah Zakariya. 2015. ‘The Notion of Place, Place Meaning and Identity in Urban Regeneration’. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 170 (January): 709–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.073.
Widodo, Johannes. 2019. ‘Human, Nature, And Architecture’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 3 (2): 145–48. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v3i2.65.
Yazdanfar, S A, A A Heidari, and F Nekooeimehr. 2013. ‘An Investigation of the Relationship between Sense of Place and Place Attachment among Dormitory Students’. International Journal of Architectural Engineering & Urban Planning 23 (2). http://ijaup.iust.ac.ir/article-1-163-en.pdf.
———. 2021. Public Places Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315158457.
Lake, Reginaldo Chistophori. 2020. ‘Architecture as a Relation of Doing and Being’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 5 (3): 329–30. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i3.665.
Lesmana, Diyan, Antariksa, Lisa Dwi Wulandari, and Herry Santosa. 2021. ‘Senses of Place in Lawas Maspati Village Community at Surabaya: Exploration Study towards Physical, Social, and Cultural Factors’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 6 (1): 67–74. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i1.595.
Paukaeva, Anastasiia A., Tsuyoshi Setoguchi, Norihiro Watanabe, and Vera I. Luchkova. 2020. ‘Temporary Design on Public Open Space for Improving the Pedestrian’s Perception Using Social Media Images in Winter Cities’. Sustainability 12 (15): 6062. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156062.
Peng, Jianchao, Dirk Strijker, and Qun Wu. 2020. ‘Place Identity: How Far Have We Come in Exploring Its Meanings?’ Frontiers in Psychology 11 (March). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00294.
Pradono, Budi. 2019. ‘The Interiority of Proximity Between Nature and Architecture in Contemporary and Tropically Context with Cases Studies’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 3 (2): 129–44. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v3i2.63.
Purwanto, Edi, and Arnis Rochma Harani. 2020. ‘Understanding the Place Attachment and Place Identity in Public Space through the Ability of Community Mental Map’. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 402 (1): 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/402/1/012024.
Qazimi, Shukran. 2014. ‘Sense of Place and Place Identity’. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research 1 (1): 306. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v1i1.p306-310.
Ramadhani, Annisa Nur, Muhammad Faqih, and Arina Hayati. 2018. ‘Inhabitant’S Sense of Place in the Context of Tourism Kampung’. Journal of Architecture&ENVIRONMENT 17 (2): 151. https://doi.org/10.12962/j2355262x.v17i2.a3894.
Rassi, Fatemeh, and Zeiae Shahabi. 2015. ‘Husserl’s Phenomenology and Two Terms of Noema and Noesis’. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 53 (June): 29–34. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.53.29.
Redyantanu, Bramasta Putra, and Rully Damayanti. 2017. ‘Temporality in a Discussion of Sustainable Architecture’. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment) 44 (2). https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.44.2.163-170.
Sastrosasmito, Sudaryono. 2020. ‘Arsitektur Sebagai Realitas Kemanusiaan (Dari Keseharian Sampai Kesadaran Transendental)’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 5 (2): 141–42. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i2.531.
Scannell, Leila, and Robert Gifford. 2010. ‘Defining Place Attachment: A Tripartite Organizing Framework’. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006.
Schmidt, Stefan W. 2020. ‘Body and Place as the Noetic-Noematic Structure of Geographical Experience’. Research in Phenomenology 50 (2): 261–81. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691640-12341450.
Smaldone, David. 2006. ‘The Role of Time in Place Attachment’. Methods, 47–56. http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_nrs-P-14.pdf#page=56.
Stedman, Richard C. 2003. ‘Sense of Place and Forest Science: Toward a Program of Quantitative Research’. Forest Science 49 (6): 822–29. https://tot.unm.edu/assets/docs/stedman2003_sop_forsci.pdf.
Sudradjat, Iwan. 2020. ‘Teori Dalam Penelitian Arsitektur’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 5 (1): i–vi. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i1.378.
Sulistiani, Melinda, and Rully Damayanti. 2018. ‘Studi Temporalitas Ruang Terhadap Place Attachment: Kasus Pada Kafe Di Koridor Jalan Mayjend Yono Soewoyo, Surabaya’. Jurnal EDimensi Arsitektur 6 (1): 409–16. https://publication.petra.ac.id/index.php/teknik-arsitektur/article/view/8458/7653.
Ujang, Norsidah, and Khalilah Zakariya. 2015. ‘The Notion of Place, Place Meaning and Identity in Urban Regeneration’. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 170 (January): 709–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.073.
Widodo, Johannes. 2019. ‘Human, Nature, And Architecture’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 3 (2): 145–48. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v3i2.65.
Yazdanfar, S A, A A Heidari, and F Nekooeimehr. 2013. ‘An Investigation of the Relationship between Sense of Place and Place Attachment among Dormitory Students’. International Journal of Architectural Engineering & Urban Planning 23 (2). http://ijaup.iust.ac.ir/article-1-163-en.pdf.