An evaluation of the alleys of Glodok and its market culture

Main Article Content

Valary Budianto
Redemptsia Quinn Elsa Tadeus
Jeanette Djaukar
Marissa Sugangga
Agus Suharjono Ekomadyo

Abstract

Glodok is considered one of the largest Chinese urban areas in Indonesia, featuring shops, dwellings, temples, alleyways, and various other elements of Chinese culture. Several local urban practices can also be identified, including selling and buying, as well as the house-shop relations that are accomplished through the spaces between the buildings or the alleys. The people act as active agents of spatial production in everyday life in this location, supporting their economic, social, and cultural activities. To investigate the interrelationship between Chinese-Indonesian market culture and its influence on interiority, literature studies, and ethnography methods were practiced. The results of the study showed three main aspects affecting the interiority of Glodok, namely the 3-dimensional space of the alleys, the cultural identity, and the activity of the people, as well as experiences. Furthermore, the interiority is manifested in the activity of each individual and experiences within the alley, which exists due to market culture. Through an architectural approach that focuses on accommodating the local tradition, culture, and beliefs, the ambience present in Glodok causes both the people and visitors to unintentionally think about nostalgic experiences and memories, thereby creating an emotional, cultural, and historical engagement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Budianto, Valary, Redemptsia Quinn Elsa Tadeus, Jeanette Djaukar, Marissa Sugangga, and Agus Suharjono Ekomadyo. 2023. “An Evaluation of the Alleys of Glodok and Its Market Culture”. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 8 (3), 395-404. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v8i3.2547.
Section
ARTICLES-RESEARCH

References

Aguspriyanti, Carissa Dinar. 2022. “Understanding Place Attachment in Temporary Public Space through Noematic-Noetic Synthesis.” ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 7 (2): 197–204. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v7i2.1402.
Altman, Irwin, and Setha M. Low. 1992. Place Attachment: A Conceptual Inquiry. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8753-4_1.
Atmodiwirjo, Paramita, Mikhael Johanes, and Yandi Andri Yatmo. 2019. “Mapping Stories: Representing Urban Everyday Narratives and Operations.” Urban Design International 24 (4): 225–40. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-019-00100-x.
Atmodiwirjo, Paramita, and Yandi Andri Yatmo. 2018. “Editorial: Interiority as Relations.” Interiority 1 (2): 87–90. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v1i2.40.
———. 2019. “Interiority in Everyday Space: A Dialogue between Materiality and Occupation.” Interiority 2 (1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v2i1.56.
———. 2021. “Urban Interiority: Emerging Cultural and Spatial Practices.” Interiority 4 (1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v4i1.131.
Barton, Clifton. 1983. “Trust and Credit: Some Observations Regarding Business Strategies of Overseas Chinese Traders in South Vietnam.” In The Chinese in Southeast Asia. Chinese: The Chinese in Southeast Asia. The Chinese in Southeast Asia%0A%0A.
Bastin, John. 2015. “Raffles and Hastings: Private Exchanges behind the Founding of Singapore.” In Raffles and the Chinese of Indonesia and Singapore, 259–64. Marshall Cavendish International.
Benjamin, Walter. 2002. The Arcades Project: Walter Benjamin (H. Eiland & K. McLaughlin, Trans.). Third Prin. Belknap Press: An Imprint of Harvard University Press.
Crysler, C. Greig. 2003. Writing Spaces: Discourses of Architecture, Urbanism and the Built Environment 1960-2000. British: UK: Routledge. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=-CaDAgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=id#v=onepage&q&f=false.
Dwisusanto, Yohanes Basuki, and Christin Purnamasari Nusaputra. 2022. “The Analysis of Informal Activities in Street Space of Semarang’s Chinatown, Indonesia.” ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 7 (2): 155–62. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v7i2.1182.
Fatimah, Titin. 2014. Sejarah Kawasan Pecinan Pancoran-Glodok Dalam Konteks Lokalitas Kampung Kota Jakarta. Jakarta: Seminar Nasional Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta. https://www.academia.edu/44082894/SEJARAH_KAWASAN_PECINAN_PANCORAN_GLODOK_DALAM_KONTEKS_LOKALITAS_KAMPUNG_KOTA_JAKARTA_The_History_of_Pancoran_Glodok_Chinatown_in_the_Context_of_Urban_Kampong_Locality_in_Jakarta.
Greig, Doreen E. 1987. The Reluctant Colonist: Netherlanders Abroad in The 17th and 18th Centuries. First Edit. Assen: Van Gorcum Ltd.
Gungwu, Wang. 1988. “The Study of Chinese Identities in Southeast Asia. In Jeniffer Cushman and Wang Gungwu.” In Changing Ethnic Identities of the Southeast Asian Chinese since World War II, 1–22. Hongkong: University of Hong Kong Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=USbxAQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=The+Study+of+Chinese+Identities+in+Southeast+Asia.+In+Jeniffer+Cushman+and+Wang+Gungwu,+eds&ots=XqJT6LoeF9&sig=0bYl9fc5oaHuubXzXpRdZlAzd7g&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=The Study of Chinese Identities in Southeast Asia. In Jeniffer Cushman and Wang Gungwu%2C eds&f=false.
Harani, Arnis Rochma, Titien Woro Murtini, and Mustika Kusumaning Wardhani. 2022. “Interior Practice of Women in Kampung Kauman Semarang.” Interiority 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v5i1.128.
Harrell, Stevan. 1985. “Why Do the Chinese Work So Hard?” Modern China 11 (2): 203–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/009770048501100203.
Hefner, Robert W. 2019. Market Cultures: Society And Morality In The New Asian Capitalisms (1st Ed.). Roudledge.
Hénard, Eugene. 1972. Alle Origini Dell’urbanistica: La Costruzione Della Metropoli. D. Calabi & M. Folin (Eds.). Italian Ed.
Juwita, Ruth Dea, and Yohanes Basuki Dwisusanto. 2022. “Spatial Integration of Urban Informality in Jakarta.” ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 7 (3): 357–68. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v7i3.1663.
Landa, Janet Tai. 1983. “The Political Economy of the Ethnically Homogeneous Chinese Middleman Group in Southeast Asia.” In In Linda Y. C. Lim and L. A. Peter Gosling, Eds., The Chinese in Southeast Asia, 86–116. Singapore and Ann Arbor: Maruzen and University of Michigan, Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies.
Limlingan, Victor S. 1987. The Overseas Chinese in ASEAN: Business Strategies and Management Practices. Manila: Vita Development Corporation.
Mackie, J. A. C. 1988. “Changing Economic Roles and Ethnic Identities of the Southeast Asian Chinese: A Comparison of Indonesia and Thailand. In Jeniffer Cushman and Wang Gungwu, Eds.” In Changing Ethnic Identities of the Southeast Asian Chinese since World War II, 217–60. Hongkong: University of Hong Kong Press.
Martinelli, Patrizio M. 2019. “House, Street, City: Le Corbusier’s Research Towards a New Urban Interior.” Interiority 2 (2): 129–53. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v2i2.57.
Mezzino, Davide. 2017. “Cultural Built Heritage’s Tangible and Intangible Dimensions and Digitalization Challenges.” Ottawa, Ontario: Carleton University. https://doi.org/10.22215/etd/2017-12183.
Nusaputra, Christin Purnamasari, and Yohanes Basuki Dwisusanto. 2022. “Fragmentation of Street Space Usage in Chinatown Village Semarang, Indonesia.” ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 7 (1): 33–42. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v7i1.1181.
Omohundro, John T. 1981. Chinese Merchant Families in Iloilo: Commerce and Kin in a Central Philippines City. Manila: Athens: Ohio University Press.
Paramita, Kristanti Dewi, and Tatjana Schneider. 2018. “Passage Territories: Reframing Living Spaces in Contested Contexts.” Interiority 1 (2): 113–29. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v1i2.34.
Pimlott, Mark. 2018. “Interiority and The Conditions of Interior.” Interiority 1 (1): 5–20. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v1i1.5.
Poot, Tine, Maarten Van Acker, and Els De Vos. 2015. “The Public Interior:” IDEA Journal, July, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.37113/ideaj.vi0.52.
Rapoport, Amos. 2000. “Culture and Built Form–A Reconsideration.” In In K. D. Moore (Ed.), Culture–Meaning–Architecture: Critical Reflections on the Work of Amos Rapoport, 1st Editio, 175–217. Routledge.
Redding, S. Gordon. 1991. The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism. Berlin and New York: Walter de Greuter. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=KZwiAAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=The+Spirit+of+Chinese+Capitalism&ots=3gsPgCXZi8&sig=fj9vddZ6-nDRgiOE3pvGvVh-KHU&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism&f=false.
Scannell, Leila, and Robert Gifford. 2014. “The Psychology of Place Attachment. In R. Gifford (Ed.),.” In Environmental Psychology: Principles and Practice, edited by Robert Gifford, Edition 5t, 272–300. Optimal Books. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279718543_The_psychology_of_place_attachment.
Skinner, G. William. 1957. Chinese Society in Thailand: An Analytical History. New York: Cornell University Press. https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb02474.0001.001.
Soewarno, Nurtati, and Mustika Kusumaning Wardhani. 2023. “The Transformation of Shophouse as an Effort to Continue the Trading Tradition in Pasar Baru Area, Bandung.” ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 8 (1): 115–24. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v8i1.1976.
Suyama, Taku. 1976. “Pang Societies and the Economy of Chinese Immigrants in Southeast Asia.” In In K.G. Tregonning, Ed., Papers in Malayan History, 193–213. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Nagasaki University. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Pang_Societies_and_Economy_of_Chinese_Im.html?id=_mIUzgEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Widodo, Johannes. 2004. The Boat And The City: Chinese Diaspora And The Morphology Of Southeast Asian Coastal Cities. singapore: Marshall Cavendish Academic.
Wu, Yuan Li. 1983. Chinese Entrepreneurs in Southeast Asia. American Economic Association. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1816824.
Yatmo, Yandi Andri, and Paramita Atmodiwirjo. 2013. “Sneezing as a Form of Transaction between Active Body and Space.” The Senses and Society 8 (2): 193–207. https://doi.org/10.2752/174589313X13589681980777.