Multi-scenario location-allocation in decision-making for improving educational facility services in Kupang City

Main Article Content

Amandus Jong Tallo
Ali A. Alraouf
Caesaryo Arif Wibowo

Abstract

Regional development is inseparable from the support of education facilities. Spatial disparities in education facilities' service scales occur unevenly in the Kupang city administration. Overlaying several thematic maps with Location-Allocation analysis provides a development scenario for placing education facilities. Secondary data in the form of the distribution of existing educational facilities, consisting of elementary schools, junior high schools , and senior high schools derived from Kupang City's Regional Spatial Plan (RTRW) data, road network and building distribution obtained based on Open Street Map (OSM) publications. Comparing the overall parameters, it can be recommended that the most efficient scenario that has the least positive impact and the least negative impact is the scenario with ¼ of the optimal number of new facilities for elementary and junior high schools, while for senior high schools there needs to be further consideration between the scenario with the optimal number and the scenario with ¼ of the optimal number of new facilities in Kupang City.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Tallo, Amandus Jong, Ali A. Alraouf, and Caesaryo Arif Wibowo. 2024. “Multi-Scenario Location-Allocation in Decision-Making for Improving Educational Facility Services in Kupang City”. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 9 (1), 121-28. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v9i1.3264.
Section
ARTICLES-RESEARCH

References

Abd El Karim, Ashraf, and Mohsen M. Awawdeh. 2020. ‘Integrating GIS Accessibility and Location-Allocation Models with Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Evaluating Quality of Life in Buraidah City, KSA’. Sustainability 12 (4): 1412. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041412.
Apriathama, Reyhan. 2022. ‘1 Liter Bensin Berapa Km Motor Dan Mobil? Ini Perhitungannya!’ Artikel Rumah 123. 2022.
Badan Standarisasi Nasional. 2004. SNI 03-1733-2004, Tata Cara Perencanaan Lingkungan Perumahan Di Perkotaan. Indonesia.
Baihaqi, M. Khoirul, Andri Suprayogi, and Hana Sugiastu Firdaus. 2019. ‘Analisis Aksesibilitas Shelter BRT Terhadap SMP Dan SMA Negeri Di Kota Semarang Berbasis Sistem Informasi Geografis’. Jurnal Geodesi Undip 8 (4). https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/geodesi/article/viewFile/25153/22363.
Benita, Francisco, Vyacheslav Kalashnikov, and Bige Tunçer. 2021. ‘A Spatial Livability Index for Dense Urban Centers’. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 48 (7): 2006–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320960151.
Cao, Kai, Wenwen Li, and Richard Church. 2020. ‘Big Data, Spatial Optimization, and Planning’. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 47 (6): 941–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320935269.
Cresswell, Tim. 2023. ‘Steering His Own Ship: Yi-Fu Tuan (1930–2022)’. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 113 (3): 790–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2158023.
Curtis, Carey, and Jan Scheurer. 2010. ‘Planning for Sustainable Accessibility: Developing Tools to Aid Discussion and Decision-Making’. Progress in Planning 74 (2): 53–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2010.05.001.
Devi, Yashoda, Sabyasachi Patra, and Surya Prakash Singh. 2022. ‘A Location-Allocation Model for Influenza Pandemic Outbreak: A Case Study in India’. Operations Management Research 15: 487–502.
ESRI. 2024. ‘Closet Facility Analysis’. ArcGIS Dekstop. 2024.
Humas Jabar. 2024. ‘2024, Pemdaprov Jabar Mulai Bangun 144 Sekolah Baru’. Jabarprov.Go.Id. 2024.
Kupang, BAPPEDA Kota. 2011. ‘Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Kupang’. Kupang.
Li, Miaoyi, Xinyue Ye, Shanqi Zhang, Xiaoyong Tang, and Zhenjiang Shen. 2018. ‘A Framework of Comparative Urban Trajectory Analysis’. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 45 (3): 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317710023.
Li, Xiang, Fahui Wang, and Hong Yi. 2017. ‘A Two-Step Approach to Planning New Facilities towards Equal Accessibility’. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 44 (6): 994–1011. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813516657083.
Meena, Dharmendera Kumar, Rajeev Tripathi, and Sonam Agrawal. 2022. ‘An Evaluation of Primary Schools and Its Accessibility Using GIS Techniques: A Case Study of Prayagraj District, India’. GeoJournal 88 (2): 1921–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10715-3.
Pafka, Elek, Kim Dovey, and Gideon DPA Aschwanden. 2020. ‘Limits of Space Syntax for Urban Design: Axiality, Scale and Sinuosity’. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 47 (3): 508–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808318786512.
Papcunová, Viera, Marek Dvořák, Roman Vavrek, Jarmila Mižičková, Petra Harasimová, Monika Víchová, and Tomáš Váňa. 2023. ‘Availability and Quality of School Facilities as a Determinant of Local Economic Development: The Slovak Experience’. Economies 11 (2): 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11020035.
Priyantoro, Donny Dwisatryo, and Agung Kurniawan. 2022. ‘Membandingkan Jejak Karbon, Kendaraan Apa Yang Paling Tinggi Emisinya’. Kompas.Com. 2022.
Shahparvari, Shahrooz, Masih Fadaki, and Prem Chhetri. 2020. ‘Spatial Accessibility of Fire Stations for Enhancing Operational Response in Melbourne’. Fire Safety Journal 117 (October): 103149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103149.
Uddin, Md Shahab, and Pennung Warnitchai. 2020. ‘Decision Support for Infrastructure Planning: A Comprehensive Location–Allocation Model for Fire Station in Complex Urban System’. Natural Hazards 102 (3): 1475–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03981-2.
Wikipedia. 2018. ‘Kota Kupang’. Wikipedia Ensiklodia Bebas. 2018. https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kota_Kupang.