Main Article Content
At the beginning of the 20th century, the terms genotype and phenotype in biology were adopted into architecture. In the science of architecture genotype was an abstract relational model that governs the arrangement of space, and the principle of organizing space while phenotype was a physical form of architecture. Genotype passed from generation to generation thus informing an identity in the community. The development of globalization and the environment can influence the identity of architectural diversity in each region. Vulnerability in the transformation of architectural forms can have an impact on identities that can survive or disappear. Malay traditional houses in West Kalimantan are on stilts and are located on the riverside. the sample used is a traditional Malay house around the palace in West Kalimantan with a sample of 8 cities and uses 69 sample houses. The method in this study uses the Levi Strauss structuralism and configuration space. External structure analysis has an informed of variation phenotype. through configuration space to finding archetypes. Then, continue to inner structure analysis to finding genotype from that archetype. The result from this study found the value and meanings of principle and arrangement space in traditional Malay house in West Kalimantan in the form of zoning of men and women as well as clean and dirty zones which have always been passed down from generation to generation.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Bafna, Sonit. 2012. ‘Rethinking Genotype: Comments on the Sources of Type in Architecture. Response to Julienne Hanson’s The Anatomy of Privacy in Architect’ London Houses’. Journal of Space Syntax 3 (1): 69–80. http://joss.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/journal/index.php/joss/article/view/108/pdf.
Baye, Tesfaye M, Tilahun Abebe, and Russell A Wilke. 2011. ‘Genotype–Environment Interactions and Their Translational Implications’. Personalized Medicine 8 (1): 59–70. https://doi.org/10.2217/pme.10.75.
Byun, Nahyang, and Jaepil Choi. 2016. ‘A Typology of Korean Housing Units: In Search of Spatial Configuration’. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 15 (1): 41–48. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.15.41.
Dyda, Iryba. 2015. ‘The Concept of Traditional Architecture in Terms of Preserving Identity of Modern Arcitectural Space in Ukraine’. Architectural Studies 1 (2): 49–56. http://science.lpnu.ua/sites/default/files/journal-paper/2017/jun/3395/irynadydatheconceptoftraditionalarchitectureintermsofpreservingidentityofmodernarchitecturalspaceinu.pdf.
Eliade, M. 2003. Cosmos and History: The Myth of the Eternal Return. USA: Harper & Brothers.
Güney, Yasemin. 2007. ‘Type and Typology in Architectural Discourse’. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 9 (1): 3–18. http://fbed.balikesir.edu.tr/index.php/dergi/article/view/186/169.
Hanson, J. 1998. ‘The Anatomy of Privacy in Architect “London Houses”’. In Decoding Homes and Houses. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. http://18.104.22.168/uploads/joss/DH&H_Chapter_08.pdf.
Heidegger, Martin. 1971. Poetry, Language, Thought. New York: Harper & Row.
Hillier, Bill. 1996. Space Is the Machine. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Hillier, Bill, and Julienne Hanson. 1984. The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597237.
Hillier, Bill, and Adrian Leaman. 1974. ‘How Is Design Possible?’ Journal of Architectural Research 3 (1): 4–11. https://ojs.unbc.ca/index.php/design/article/view/531/468.
Ibrahim, Hatem Galal A. 2016. ‘Regeneration of Sustainability in Contemporary Architecture: Approach Based on Native Function and Activities to Strengthen Identity’. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 216 (January): 800–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.077.
Ledent, G. 2017. ‘Permanence to Allow Change. The Archetypal Room’. In Architectural Research Addressing Societal Challenges, 339–44. Taylor & Francis Group, 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300, Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315226255-54.
Lee, Ji-Hyun, ed. 2017. Morphological Analysis of Cultural DNA. KAIST Research Series. Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2329-3.
Notkin, I. I. 1988. ‘GENOTYPES OF SPATIAL FORM IN THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE EAST’. Muqarnas Online 6 (1): 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1163/22118993-90000234.
Pieruschka, Roland, and Uli Schurr. 2019. ‘Plant Phenotyping: Past, Present, and Future’. Plant Phenomics 2019 (March): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.34133/2019/7507131.
Sari, Indah Kartika, Wiendu Nuryanti, and Ikaputra. 2020. ‘Phenotype, Genotype and Environment in Architecture Case Study: Traditional Malay House, West Borneo’. Preprints. 2020. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202005.0034/v1.
Seo, Kyung Wook. 2012. ‘DNA of the House’. Home Cultures 9 (1): 77–97. https://doi.org/10.2752/175174212X13202276383850.
———. 2017. ‘Finding Housing Genotypes by Graph Theory: An Investigation into Malay Houses’. In , 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2329-3_4.