The challenge of city competitive advantange-rethingking creative city networking
Main Article Content
Abstract
Competition between cities in globalization has been made through various efforts. The city must also win a competition through brands in the form of quality of life of creative cities. UNESCO also lists the need for an optimal effort to develop the community's culture and creativity to stimulate the city's regeneration into sustainability. The study aims to dissect the city of Pekalongan as a case study. The research uses qualitative methods with data collection through the Big Data harvesting process analyzed through the interpretation process. The findings are the relationship between the physical elements of city space and the strong meaning concerning the creative abilities possessed by its people, both tangible and intangible. It is this strength that underlies the distinctive and sustainable cultural development to build a city competitive advantage.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Bawole, Paulus. 2020. ‘Pengembangan Kampung Kota Sebagai Salah Satu Alternatif Tujuan Wisata Minat Khusus’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 5 (1): 115–26. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i1.362.
Blakely, Edward James, and Nancey Green Leigh. 2013. Planning Local Economic Development: Theory and Practice. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, California, United States: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Campbell, Colin. 2005. ‘The Craft Consumer’. Journal of Consumer Culture 5 (1): 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540505049843.
Comunian, Roberta. 2011. ‘Rethinking the Creative City’. Urban Studies 48 (6): 1157–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010370626.
Costa, Pedro. 2007. ‘Creativity, Innovation and Territorial Agglomeration in Cultural Activities: The Roots of the Creative City’. In Creative Cities, Cultural Clusters and Local Economic Development, edited by Philip Cooke and Luciana Lazzeretti, 183–210. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Costin, Cathy Lynne. 2001. ‘Craft Production Systems’. In Archaeology at the Millennium, 273–327. Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72611-3_8.
———. 2015. ‘Craft Specialization’. In The International Encyclopedia of Human Sexuality. United States: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Dormer, Peter. 1997. The Culture of Craft (Studies in Design and Material Culture). Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
Florek, Magdalena. 2011. ‘No Place like Home: Perspectives on Place Attachment and Impacts on City Management’. Journal of Town & City Management 1 (4): 346–54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288350728_No_place_like_home_Perspectives_on_place_attachment_and_impacts_on_city_management.
Florida, Richard. 2004. Cities and the Creative Class. 1st ed. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis: Psychology Press.
Fuller, Glen, Caroline Hamilton, and Kirsten Seale. 2013. ‘Working with Amateur Labour: Between Culture and Economy’. Cultural Studies Review 19 (1). https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v19i1.3223.
Huhtamaa, Inkeri. 2010. Namibian Bodily Appearance and Handmade Objects : The Meanings of Appearance Culture and Handmade Objects from the Perspective of the Craft Persons. Finland: Aalto University.
Ingold, Tim. 2016. Redrawing Anthropology Materials, Movements, Lines. Farnham, United Kingdom: Routledge: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
Landry, Charles. 2005. ‘Lineages of the Creative City’. Creativity and the City, Netherlands Architecture Institute. Netherlands. http://charleslandry.com/panel/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2013/03/Lineages-of-the-Creative-City.pdf.
———. 2008. The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. 2nd ed. United Kingdom: Routledge.
Markusen, Ann. 2006. ‘Cultural Planning and the Creative City’. In Annual American Collegiate Schools of Planning Meetings, Ft. Worth, TX. Citeseer, 2:12–24. Washington, United States: Regional and Industrial Economics Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs University of Minnesota. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.460.8123&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Mills, Kathy A. 2018. ‘What Are the Threats and Potentials of Big Data for Qualitative Research?’ Qualitative Research 18 (6): 591–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117743465.
Nursanty, Eko. 2021. ‘The Anatomy of Place Branding: Relating Place Transformation to Community Identity’. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 17 (1): 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-019-00157-z.
Oaks, Thousand, Trudie Aberdeen, and Educational Psychology. 2013. ‘Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.’ The Canadian Journal of Action Research 14 (1): 69–71. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v14i1.73.
Sasaki, Masayuki. 2010. ‘Urban Regeneration through Cultural Creativity and Social Inclusion: Rethinking Creative City Theory through a Japanese Case Study’. Cities 27 (June): S3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2010.03.002.
———. 2011. ‘Urban Regeneration through Cultural Diversity and Social Inclusion’. Journal of Urban Culture Research 2: 30–49. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JUCR/article/view/20387.
Scott, Allen John. 2014. ‘Beyond the Creative City: Cognitive–Cultural Capitalism and the New Urbanism’. Regional Studies 48 (4): 565–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.891010.
The Japan Foundation, and JENESYS East Asia Future Leaders Programme. 2009. Urban Community Development Inspired by Culture : The Potential of Creative Cities, July 29-August 7, 2008. Japan: The Japan Foundation. https://www.jpf.go.jp/e/project/intel/archive/jenesys/pdf/report_b.pdf.
Varbanova, Lidia. 2007. ‘Our Creative Cities Online’. In The Creative City: Crossing Visions and New Realities in the Region, edited by N. Svob-Dokic, 9–18. Zagreb: Institute of International Relations.
Yencken, David. 1988. The Creative City. Meanjin. Melbourne: Meanjin. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849666565.ch-005.
Yin, Robert K. 2008. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Applied Social Research Methods). 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.