KRISIS METAFISIKA DAN FILSAFAT  SEBAGAI TUGAS BERPIKIR: PERSPEKTIF HEIDEGGER

Petrus Tan

doi:10.30822/lumenveritatis.v14i2.2513

Petrus Tan Fakultas Filsafat Unwira Kupang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30822/lumenveritatis.v14i2.2513

Keywords: Being, beings, metaphysics, thinking, philosophy

Abstract

This article aims to reflect further Heidegger's thought on the crisis of metaphysics and philosophy as a task of thinking. Philosophy since ancient times, even today, has been oriented to seek and formulate the essential and universal concept. Is it true that searching for the ontotheological nature is the most important task of philosophy? Is it true that these single principles can reflect the truth? By using the method of library researh and critical analysis of Heidegger's works and studies on the crisis of metaphysics, this article shows that philosophy essentially does not aim to formulate absolute, universal and single notion. Philosophy is also not a project of producing standard, abstract, sophisticated and technical concepts. The important task of philosophy is to encourage men to think, an art of understanding. Thinking is not a calculative thinking (instrumental-technical rationality) but meditative and reflective thinking. Under philosophy as the task of thinking, Being, namely the totality of reality, is responded with amazement, humility and simplicity. Philosophy must liberate itself from the metaphysical trap of totalitarian power which tends to hegemonize others in the name of a single truth, to philosophy that celebrates the plurality of truths with humility dan simplicity. That is the real meaning of philosophy as philo-sophia, the love of wisdom.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Braver, Lee. The Groundless Grounds. London: The MIT Press, 2012.

Fried, G. “Introduction to Metaphysics,” in The Bloomsbury Companion to Heidegger. London: Bloomsbury Academic, ed. Gregory Fried. USA: Routledge, 2016.

Hardiman, F. B. Heidegger dan Mistik Keseharian, Cet. 4. Jakarta: KPG, 2020.

----------------------. Filsafat Modern. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2007.

Heidegger. Being and Time, penerj. John Macquarrie & Edward Robinson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1962.

---------------. Introduction to Metaphysics, penerj. G. Fried and R. Polt. London: NB, 2000.

---------------. Nietzsche. Vol. IV, 1980.

---------------. “Being and Time,” in Basic Writings, ed. David Farrell Krell. London: Routledge, 1978.

---------------. “The End of Philosophy and The Task of Thinking,” in Basic Writings, ed. David Farrel Krell. London: Routledge, 1978.

---------------. “The Letter on Humanism,” in Basic Writings, ed. David Farrell Krell. London: Routledge, 1978.

Krell, David Farrell. “General Introduction,” in Basic Writing, ed. David Farrell Krell. London: Routledge, 1978.

Levinas, Emanuel. “Is Ontology Fundamental?” in The Basic Philosophical Writings. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1996.

Partenie, Cetalin and Tom Rockmore. “Introduction,” in Heidegger and Plato, Toward Dialogue, ed. Cetalin Partenie dan Tom Rockmore. USA: Northwestern University Press, 2005.

Poleschuck, Iriana. “Heidegger and Levinas: Metaphysics, Ontology and the Horizon of the Other.” Indo- Pasific Journal of Phenomenology, Vol. 10, No. 2, Oktober 2010.

Rae, G. “Heidegger’s Influence on Post-Humanism.” History of Human Sciences, Vol. 27 (1), 2014.

Sastrapratedja, M. Manusia dalam Berbagai Relasi. STF Driyarkara, 2021.

Tjahjadi, Simon Petrus L. tuhan Para Filsuf dan Ilmuwan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2007.

Thomson, I. Heidegger on Ontotheology. London: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Villa, Dana R. Arendt and Heidegger: The Fate of Political. London: Princeton University Press, 1996.

Wibowo, A. Setyo. “Kronologi Jalan Hidup Heidegger.” Basis, NO.7-8, Tahun ke-67, 2018.

Yi, Chung Cin. “The Deconstruction Theory of Heidegger and Derrida.” IRWLE, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2010.