Understanding place attachment in temporary public space through noematic-noetic synthesis

Carissa Dinar Aguspriyanti

doi:10.30822/arteks.v7i2.1402

Penulis

Carissa Dinar Aguspriyanti Department of Architecture, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, Universitas Internasional Batam , Department of Architecture, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, Universitas Internasional Batam https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5528-2023 (tidak diautentikasi)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v7i2.1402

Kata Kunci:

Noema noesis, Place attachment, Public space, Ramadan street market, Temporary

Abstrak

Untuk menciptakan ruang publik temporer yang berhasil dan dapat bertahan dalam menghadapi perubahan kontemporer, terutama di era pandemi yang penuh ketidakpastian ini, tingkat keterikatan masyarakat terhadap tempat tersebut (place attachment) harus dikelola. Hal ini semata-mata karena jika ruang publik semakin dibutuhkan, maka semakin banyak pengguna yang akan menggunakan ruang tersebut, sehingga rasa memiliki akan tumbuh setelahnya untuk membantu menjaga keberlanjutannya. Namun, aspek temporalitas waktu dapat mempengaruhi perkembangan place attachment seseorang. Dengan menggunakan analisis fenomenologis Husserl tentang noema dan noesis, studi kualitatif ini bermaksud untuk memahami perkembangan place attachment di salah satu ruang publik temporer yang terkenal di Indonesia yakni pasar jalanan Ramadhan, khususnya di Batam. Observasi langsung dan wawancara semi terstruktur dilakukan untuk mengumpulkan data yang berkaitan dengan kerangka teori place attachment yang diperoleh dari kajian pustaka. Studi ini mengungkapkan bahwa, melalui sintesis noematik, dimensi eksternal (karakteristik fisik) cenderung mengarah pada keterikatan fungsional atau place dependence. Sedangkan melalui sintesis noetik, keterikatan psikologis atau place identity dari ruang publik temporer dapat dipengaruhi oleh dimensi internal place attachment (interaksi sosial, kohesi sosial, dan simbol sosial).

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

Carmona, Matthew. 2019. ‘Principles for Public Space Design, Planning to Do Better’. URBAN DESIGN International 24 (1): 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-018-0070-3.

———. 2021. Public Places Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315158457.

Lake, Reginaldo Chistophori. 2020. ‘Architecture as a Relation of Doing and Being’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 5 (3): 329–30. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i3.665.

Lesmana, Diyan, Antariksa, Lisa Dwi Wulandari, and Herry Santosa. 2021. ‘Senses of Place in Lawas Maspati Village Community at Surabaya: Exploration Study towards Physical, Social, and Cultural Factors’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 6 (1): 67–74. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i1.595.

Paukaeva, Anastasiia A., Tsuyoshi Setoguchi, Norihiro Watanabe, and Vera I. Luchkova. 2020. ‘Temporary Design on Public Open Space for Improving the Pedestrian’s Perception Using Social Media Images in Winter Cities’. Sustainability 12 (15): 6062. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156062.

Peng, Jianchao, Dirk Strijker, and Qun Wu. 2020. ‘Place Identity: How Far Have We Come in Exploring Its Meanings?’ Frontiers in Psychology 11 (March). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00294.

Pradono, Budi. 2019. ‘The Interiority of Proximity Between Nature and Architecture in Contemporary and Tropically Context with Cases Studies’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 3 (2): 129–44. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v3i2.63.

Purwanto, Edi, and Arnis Rochma Harani. 2020. ‘Understanding the Place Attachment and Place Identity in Public Space through the Ability of Community Mental Map’. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 402 (1): 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/402/1/012024.

Qazimi, Shukran. 2014. ‘Sense of Place and Place Identity’. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research 1 (1): 306. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v1i1.p306-310.

Ramadhani, Annisa Nur, Muhammad Faqih, and Arina Hayati. 2018. ‘Inhabitant’S Sense of Place in the Context of Tourism Kampung’. Journal of Architecture&ENVIRONMENT 17 (2): 151. https://doi.org/10.12962/j2355262x.v17i2.a3894.

Rassi, Fatemeh, and Zeiae Shahabi. 2015. ‘Husserl’s Phenomenology and Two Terms of Noema and Noesis’. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 53 (June): 29–34. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.53.29.

Redyantanu, Bramasta Putra, and Rully Damayanti. 2017. ‘Temporality in a Discussion of Sustainable Architecture’. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment) 44 (2). https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.44.2.163-170.

Sastrosasmito, Sudaryono. 2020. ‘Arsitektur Sebagai Realitas Kemanusiaan (Dari Keseharian Sampai Kesadaran Transendental)’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 5 (2): 141–42. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i2.531.

Scannell, Leila, and Robert Gifford. 2010. ‘Defining Place Attachment: A Tripartite Organizing Framework’. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006.

Schmidt, Stefan W. 2020. ‘Body and Place as the Noetic-Noematic Structure of Geographical Experience’. Research in Phenomenology 50 (2): 261–81. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691640-12341450.

Smaldone, David. 2006. ‘The Role of Time in Place Attachment’. Methods, 47–56. http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_nrs-P-14.pdf#page=56.

Stedman, Richard C. 2003. ‘Sense of Place and Forest Science: Toward a Program of Quantitative Research’. Forest Science 49 (6): 822–29. https://tot.unm.edu/assets/docs/stedman2003_sop_forsci.pdf.

Sudradjat, Iwan. 2020. ‘Teori Dalam Penelitian Arsitektur’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 5 (1): i–vi. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i1.378.

Sulistiani, Melinda, and Rully Damayanti. 2018. ‘Studi Temporalitas Ruang Terhadap Place Attachment: Kasus Pada Kafe Di Koridor Jalan Mayjend Yono Soewoyo, Surabaya’. Jurnal EDimensi Arsitektur 6 (1): 409–16. https://publication.petra.ac.id/index.php/teknik-arsitektur/article/view/8458/7653.

Ujang, Norsidah, and Khalilah Zakariya. 2015. ‘The Notion of Place, Place Meaning and Identity in Urban Regeneration’. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 170 (January): 709–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.073.

Widodo, Johannes. 2019. ‘Human, Nature, And Architecture’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 3 (2): 145–48. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v3i2.65.

Yazdanfar, S A, A A Heidari, and F Nekooeimehr. 2013. ‘An Investigation of the Relationship between Sense of Place and Place Attachment among Dormitory Students’. International Journal of Architectural Engineering & Urban Planning 23 (2). http://ijaup.iust.ac.ir/article-1-163-en.pdf.