Architectural design principles of a University Campus that create an educational atmosphere

Diah Cahyani Permana Sari; Mokhamad Syaom Barliana; Rr. Tjahyani Busono; Muhammad Aditya Siddiq Alfajr

doi:10.30822/arteks.v10i2.4181

Penulis

Diah Cahyani Permana Sari Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Mokhamad Syaom Barliana
Rr. Tjahyani Busono
Muhammad Aditya Siddiq Alfajr

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v10i2.4181

Kata Kunci:

Architectural design, Educational campus, Fuzzy logic system, University campus

Abstrak

Desain arsitektur merupakan bagian penting dalam proses pengembangan kampus perguruan tinggi. Penelitian evaluasi terhadap desain ini akan mengkaji sejauh mana desain arsitektur keempat kampus tersebut memenuhi parameter konsep kampus bernuansa edukasi. Penelitian ini akan memberikan gambaran kualitas desain yang berimplikasi pada pengembangan suasana akademik dan nonakademik perguruan tinggi yang pada gilirannya berdampak pada peningkatan kualitas pendidikan tinggi. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian campuran (mixed methods research/MMR). Tahap pertama penelitian ini adalah menghasilkan Prinsip Desain Prioritas Kampus Bernuansa Edukasi dengan menggunakan Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Tahap selanjutnya yaitu tahap kuantitatif yaitu mengembangkan model pengambilan keputusan kualitas kampus bernuansa edukasi dengan menggunakan sistem logika fuzzy. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tiga kriteria desain kampus bernuansa edukasi yang menjadi prioritas tertinggi digunakan untuk menjadi model pengukuran kualitas desain perguruan tinggi berbasis kampus edukasi. Ketiga kriteria tersebut menentukan apakah desain suatu kampus telah memenuhi standar minimal konsep kampus edukasi. Hasil pengujian terhadap desain empat perguruan tinggi menunjukkan bahwa hanya desain kampus Universitas Malikussaleh yang belum memenuhi konsep desain kampus bernuansa edukasi. Tiga perguruan tinggi lainnya telah memenuhi konsep desain kampus bernuansa edukasi.

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

Amirshekari, S., & Pourmand, H. 2015. The aspects of biological culture recreating and its relationship with the approach of contextual architecture (Bandar Abbas City). European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences: Proceedings, 3(4 (s)), pp-475.

Baldwin, Eric (2022). Gateway to the Future: Rethinking Campus Design. 06 Jan 2022. ArchDaily. Accessed 1 Dec 2023. <https://www.archdaily.com/974671/gateway-to-the-future-rethinking-campus-design> ISSN 0719-8884

Barliana, M.S., Purnamaningsih, M., Ramadhan, T., Susanti, I. 2023. Friendly school design of early childhood based on traditional Sundanese architecture typology, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. DOI: 10.1080/13467581.2022.2153058

Barliana, M. S., Cahyani, D., & Mardiana, R. 2020. Creative adoption of Sundanese traditional architecture for architectural and campus interior design development. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 830, No. 2, p. 022064). IOP Publishing.

Bruno, Giuliana. 2007. Public Intimacy: Architecture and the Visual Arts. PublicIA @inproceedings. url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:190081673}

Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. 2014. Advanced mixed methods research designs.

Cusumano, Vincent. 2023. The Importance of Contextual Harmony in Architecture. https://www.cusumano-architect.com/ideas/ context-is-key

Elhagla, Khalid., Nassar, Dina M., Ragheb. Mohamed A. 2020. Iconic buildings’ contribution toward urbanism. Alexandria Engineering Journal. www.elsevier.com/locate/aej

Glancey, Jonathan (2014). Sensing spaces: Emotional buildings. 21st October 2014. https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20140130-can-buildings-be-emotional

Gillason, Neil. 2010. Architectural design and the learning environment: A framework for school design research. July 2010. Learning Environments Research 13(2):127-145. DOI: 10.1007/s10984-010-9071-x

Hanafizadeh, P., Khosravi, B., & Tabatabaeian, S. H. (2020). Rethinking dominant theories used in information systems field in the digital platform era. Digital policy, regulation and governance, 22(4), 363-384.

Kaplan, Rachel. 1993. The role of nature in the context of the workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning, Volume 26, Issues 1–4, 1993, Pages 193-201, ISSN 0169-2046, https://doi.org/10.1016 /0169-2046(93)90016-7.

Karim, B. A. 2020. Pendidikan Perguruan Tinggi Era 4.0 Dalam Pandemi Covid-19 (Refleksi Sosiologis). Education and Learning Journal, 1(2), 102-112.

Lambe, N. R., & Dongre, A. R. 2019. A shape grammar approach to contextual design: A case study of the Pol houses of Ahmedabad, India. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(5), 845-861.

Laurens, J. M. 2004. Arsitektur & perilaku manusia. Grasindo.

Laurens, J. M., & Tanuwidjaja, G. 2012. Melalui pendekatan desain inklusi menuju arsitektur yang humanis (Doctoral dissertation, Petra Christian University).

Liauw, F. 2019. Reference for contextual design. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 508, No. 1, p. 012031). IOP Publishing.

Maknun, J., Barliana, M.S., Cahyani, D. 2017. The Level of Environmental Literacy toward Vocational High School Students in West Java Province. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education 12(2). Bandung: UPI. DOI: 10.17509/invotec.v12i2.6205

Naba, Agus. 2009. Belajar cepat fuzzy logic menggunakan matlab. https://api. semantic scholar.org/CorpusID:64403327.

Quirk, Quirk. 2012. Community-Oriented Architecture in Schools: How 'Extroverted' Design Can Impact Learning and Change the World. https://www.archdaily.com/213438/

Reis, A. T. L., & Lay, M.C.D. 2010. Internal and external aesthetics of housing estates. Environment and Behavior. Sage Publications: 42, 271- 294.

Saaty, T. L. (2006). Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes. European journal of operational research, 168(2), 557-570.

Sager, Jessica.2023. Learning Communities. Center of Developing Child. Harvard University. https://developingchild.harvard.edu/collective-change/key-concepts/learning-communities/

Sage, Travis. 2021. From hybrid learning to social hubs, trends are changing how universities operate and are designed. This article first appeared as “What will campus look like next?” in Stantec Design Quarterly, Issue 13. https://www.stantec. com/en/ideas/what-will-the-future-campus-look-like

Shanahan, D. F., Fuller, R. A., Bush, R., Lin, B. B., & Gaston, K. J. 2015. The health benefits of urban nature: how much do we need? BioScience, 65(5), 476-485. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv032

Sotelo, P.C.C., 2010. The concept of" Educational Campus" and its application in Spanish universities.

Sunaryo, R. G. (2010). Perubahan Setting Ruang dan Pola Aktivitas Publik di Ruang Terbuka Kampus UGM.

Suryadi, D., Barliana, M.S., Kudwadi, B., Rahmanullah, F. 2020. Building Performance and Academic Performance in Higher Education: A Post Occupation Evaluation of Overseas Loan Financing Project. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. 2010. Putting the human back in ‘‘human research methodology’’: The researcher in mixed methods research. Journal of mixed methods research, 4(4), 271-277.

Zallio, Matteo & Clarkson, P. John. 2021. Inclusion, diversity, equity and accessibility in the built environment: A study of architectural design practice. Building and Environment. journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/buildenv