The quality of biophilic elements in child-friendly open space

Agung Murti Nugroho

doi:10.30822/arteks.v6i3.1200

Penulis

Agung Murti Nugroho Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya , Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Brawijaya https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0655-1228 (tidak diautentikasi)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i3.1200

Kata Kunci:

Elemen biophilic, Kriteria, Pengembangan, Persepsi, Ruang terbuka ramah anak

Abstrak

Elemen biophilic merupakan komponen lingkungan alami yang dapat meningkatkan kualitas ruang perkotaan. Tujuan makalah ini adalah mengevaluasi kriteria, persepsi dan pengembangan elemen biophilic pada ruang terbuka yang ramah anak dengan studi kasus Taman Merjosari, Malang. Penentuan kriteria elemen biophilic dengan metode Analisys Hierarchy Process (AHP) serta persepsi elemen dengan memakai metode Importance Performance Analysis (IPA). Hasil penelitian adalah sebagai berikut: pertama, kriteria utama elemen biophilic menurut ahli adalah elemen well being dengan nilai 0,541 sedangkan ruang yang aman menjadi sub kriteria tertinggi (0,105). Kedua, hasil persepsi kualitas elemen biophilic di Taman Merjosari Malang yang berdasarkan tingkat kesesuaian paling tinggi adalah elemen tempat duduk (159,3%), kinerja pelayanan tertinggi pada elemen taman-kebun (3,95) serta tingkat kepentingan tertinggi pada elemen ruang yang aman (4,19). Ketiga, pengembangan kualitas elemen biophilic prioritas berdasarkan analisa IPA adalah peralatan bermain yang memiliki nilai prioritas paling tinggi (0,083) dengan pertimbangan desain biophilic (0,477) sesuai usulan para ahli. Terakhir, elemen biophilic yang paling penting terhadap ruang terbuka ramah anak pada Taman Merjosari, Kota Malang berdasarkan kriteria ahli dan persepsi pengunjung adalah elemen ruang yang aman.

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

Abdelaal, Mohamed S. 2019. ‘Biophilic Campus: An Emerging Planning Approach for a Sustainable Innovation-Conducive University’. Journal of Cleaner Production 215 (April): 1445–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.185.

Bahauddin, Azizi, Rani Prihantmanti, and Josephine Ong. 2021. ‘Biophilic Design Patterns and Local Knowledge of Plants Application in Baba-Nyonya Heritage Shophouses’ Courtyard’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 6 (2): 305–14. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i2.757.

Berg, Agnes E. Van den, Yannick Joye, and Sander L. Koole. 2016. ‘Why Viewing Nature Is More Fascinating and Restorative than Viewing Buildings: A Closer Look at Perceived Complexity’. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 20 (December): 397–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.10.011.

Bosch, M. van den, and Å Ode Sang. 2017. ‘Urban Natural Environments as Nature-Based Solutions for Improved Public Health – A Systematic Review of Reviews’. Environmental Research 158 (October): 373–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.040.

Chen, Xianwen, Sjerp de Vries, Timo Assmuth, Jan Dick, Tia Hermans, Ole Hertel, Anne Jensen, et al. 2019. ‘Research Challenges for Cultural Ecosystem Services and Public Health in (Peri-)Urban Environments’. Science of The Total Environment 651 (February): 2118–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.030.

Elsadek, Mohamed, Minkai Sun, Ryo Sugiyama, and Eijiro Fujii. 2019. ‘Cross-Cultural Comparison of Physiological and Psychological Responses to Different Garden Styles’. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 38 (February): 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.11.007.

Fisher, Jack E, Zorana J Andersen, Steffen Loft, and Marie Pedersen. 2017. ‘Opportunities and Challenges within Urban Health and Sustainable Development’. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 25 (April): 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.08.008.

Hasibuan, Friska, Fermanto Lianto, Samsu Hendra Siwi, and Martinus Bambang Susetyarto. 2021. ‘Utilization of Public Open Space in Kampung Deret Petogogan Jakarta’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 6 (2): 189–98. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i2.654.

Hwang, Yun Hye, and Charlotte J. Roscoe. 2017. ‘Preference for Site Conservation in Relation to On-Site Biodiversity and Perceived Site Attributes: An on-Site Survey of Unmanaged Urban Greenery in a Tropical City’. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 28 (December): 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.09.011.

Jamshidi, Saman, Jan S. Parker, and Seyedehnastaran Hashemi. 2020. ‘The Effects of Environmental Factors on the Patient Outcomes in Hospital Environments: A Review of Literature’. Frontiers of Architectural Research 9 (2): 249–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.10.001.

Jesus Henriques Silva, Fátima De, and Paula Odete Fernandes. 2011. ‘Importance-Performance Analysis as a Tool in Evaluating Higher Education Service Quality: The Empirical Results Of Estig (IPB)’. In Creating Global Competitive Economies: A 360-Degree Approach - Proceedings of the 17th International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2011, 4:306–15. Bragança, Mirandela: Instituto Politecnico De Bragaanca. https://bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt/bitstream/10198/7120/1/IBIMA_2.pdf.

Kambo, Amrita, Robin Drogemuller, and Prasad K.D.V. Yarlagadda. 2019. ‘Assessing Biophilic Design Elements for Ecosystem Service Attributes – A Sub-Tropical Australian Case’. Ecosystem Services 39 (October): 100977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100977.

Kuldna, Piret, Dr Helen Poltimäe, and Heidi Tuhkanen. 2020. ‘Perceived Importance of and Satisfaction with Nature Observation Activities in Urban Green Areas’. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 29 (March): 100227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2019.100227.

Lee, Seung Hyun. 2019. ‘Effects of Biophilic Design on Consumer Responses in the Lodging Industry’. International Journal of Hospitality Management 83 (October): 141–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.05.006.

Liem, Yoseph, and Reginaldo Chistophori Lake. 2018. ‘Pemaknaan Ruang Terbuka Publik Taman Nostalgia Kota Kupang’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 2 (2): 149–58. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v2i1.48.

Ling, Tzen-Ying, and Yi-Chang Chiang. 2018. ‘Well-Being, Health and Urban Coherence-Advancing Vertical Greening Approach toward Resilience: A Design Practice Consideration’. Journal of Cleaner Production 182 (May): 187–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.207.

Lotfi, Yomna A., Mohammed Refaat, Mohammed El Attar, and Aassem Abdel Salam. 2020. ‘Vertical Gardens as a Restorative Tool in Urban Spaces of New Cairo’. Ain Shams Engineering Journal 11 (3): 839–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.12.004.

Mangone, Giancarlo, Colin A. Capaldi, Zack M. van Allen, and P.G. Luscuere. 2017. ‘Bringing Nature to Work: Preferences and Perceptions of Constructed Indoor and Natural Outdoor Workspaces’. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 23 (April): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.02.009.

McCracken, Deborah S., Deonie A. Allen, and Alan J. Gow. 2016. ‘Associations between Urban Greenspace and Health-Related Quality of Life in Children’. Preventive Medicine Reports 3 (June): 211–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.01.013.

Meidenbauer, Kimberly L., Cecilia U.D. Stenfors, Jaime Young, Elliot A. Layden, Kathryn E. Schertz, Omid Kardan, Jean Decety, and Marc G. Berman. 2019. ‘The Gradual Development of the Preference for Natural Environments’. Journal of Environmental Psychology 65 (October): 101328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101328.

Moore, Robin C., Susan M. Goltsman, and Daniel S. Iacofano. 1992. Play For All: Guidelines. Barkeley: MIG Communication. Berkeley: CA: MIG Communications.

Muñoz, Sarah-Anne. 2009. ‘Children in the Outdoors: A Literature Review’. Sustainable Development Research Centre. Sustainable Development Research Centre on Behalf of the National Sustainable Development Centre with Support from the Forestry Commission.

Parsons, Ashley. 2011. ‘Young Children and Nature: Outdoor Play and Development, Experiences Fostering Environmental Consciousness, And the Implications on Playground Design’. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/32281/Parsons_AE_T_2011.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

Purnomo, Estining Nur Sejati, Sari Widya Sihwi, and Rini Anggrainingsih. 2013. ‘Analisis Perbandingan Menggunakan Metode AHP, TOPSIS, Dan AHP-TOPSIS Dalam Studi Kasus Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Siswa Program Akselerasi’. Jurnal Itsmart 2 (1). https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/itsmart/article/view/612/564.

Tantarto, Dhini Dewiyanti, and Dianna Astrid Hertoery. 2020. ‘The Role of Space in Sustaining Children’s Traditional Games’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 5 (3): 359–72. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i3.504.

Tsantopoulos, Georgios, Gregory Varras, Ekaterini Chiotelli, Konstantina Fotia, and Maria Batou. 2018. ‘Public Perceptions and Attitudes toward Green Infrastructure on Buildings: The Case of the Metropolitan Area of Athens, Greece’. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 34 (August): 181–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.06.017.

Yin, Jie, Shihao Zhu, Piers MacNaughton, Joseph G. Allen, and John D. Spengler. 2018. ‘Physiological and Cognitive Performance of Exposure to Biophilic Indoor Environment’. Building and Environment 132 (March): 255–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.01.006.