Symbolic interactionism in vernacular cultural landscape research

Main Article Content

Irfan Sabarilah Hasim
Indah Widiastuti
Iwan Sudradjat

Abstract

Customary and traditional villages, also called vernacular cultural landscapes, are local settlement units whose inhabitants adhere to ancestral beliefs. It is important to conduct research on vernacular cultural landscapes in Indonesia, given the usual and concerning degradation of cultural landscapes. Different places have different cultures and different customary rules and habits. Each has its uniqueness and distinctiveness, so there is no one standardized approach or method that can be adapted to study the vernacular cultural landscape. Different places may require different research approaches or methods; even the same place if studied under a different topic or time frame, may also require a different approach or method. There are research approaches commonly used by the researcher of the vernacular cultural landscape, including phenomenology, narrative study, case study, grounded theory, and ethnography. This article will review one approach that can be an alternative for the researcher of the vernacular cultural landscape, namely Symbolic Interactionism. Symbolic Interactionism is an approach that can be effectively applied to study human groups, community life, and social interactions. Symbolic interactionism is able to reveal the relationships that occur naturally among members of the society, particularly the relationship between intangible symbols, rules, norms, and daily activities, with tangible things such as the formation of space, buildings, circulation, and other physical configurations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hasim, Irfan Sabarilah, Indah Widiastuti, and Iwan Sudradjat. 2023. “Symbolic Interactionism in Vernacular Cultural Landscape Research”. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 8 (1), 135-44. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v8i1.2080.
Section
ARTICLES-RESEARCH
Author Biographies

Indah Widiastuti, Architectural History, Theory and Criticism Group, School of Architecture, Planning and Policy Development, Institut Teknologi Bandung

 

 

Iwan Sudradjat, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan

 

 

References

Ahmadi, Dadi. 2008. “Interaksi Simbolik.” Jurnal Mediator 9 (2): 301–16.
Ani, Anisa, Noorizan Mohamed, and Na Rahman. 2012. “Socio-Cultural Influences in The Composition Of Traditional Malay House Compounds In Rural Melaka.” Alam Cipta 5 (1): 63–78. http://frsb.upm.edu.my/alamcipta/index.php/alamcipta/article/viewFile/83/48.
Arisandi, Herman. 2014. Buku Pintar Pemikiran Tokoh-Tokoh Sosiologi Dari Klasik Sampai Modern. Jakarta: IRCiSoD.
AS, Enjang. 2019. “Da ’ Wah Communication in the Sundawiwitan Community.” Ilmu Dakwah: Academic Journal for Homiletic Studies 13 (1): 25–38. https://doi.org/10.15575/idajhs.v12i1.4387.
AS, Enjang, Mukhlis Aliyudin, Farid Soleh Nurdin, Muhibudin Wijaya Laksana, Sitta Resmiyanti Muslimah, and Widodo Dwi Ismail Azis. 2020. “Sunda Wiwitan: The Belief System of Baduy Indigenous Community, Banten, Indonesia.” Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama Dan Sosial Budaya 5 (1): 77–95. https://doi.org/10.15575/jw.v5i1.8069.
Becker, H.S. 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.
Blumer, H. 1986. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Derung, Teresia Noiman. 2017. “Interaksionisme Simbolik Dalam Kehidupan Bermasyarakat.” Jurnal Karakteristik Dan Pastoral 2 (1): 118–31. https://e-journal.stp-ipi.ac.id/index.php/sapa/article/view/33.
Goffman, E. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gold, Raymond L. 1958. “Roles in Sociological Field Observations.” Social Forces 36 (3): 217–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2573808.
Hatta, Asta Juliarman, and Iwan Sudrajat. 2020. ‘Peran Sanro Bola Dalam Tradisi Membangun Rumah Tradisional Bugis Di Kabupaten Soppeng’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 5 (1): 57–66. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i1.119.
Hermawan. 2023. ‘Fungsi Dan Makna Perapian Di Permukiman Desa Kalidesel, Wonosobo, Jawa Tengah’. Archimane 1 (1): 61–68. https://journal.gioarchitect.co.id/index.php/archimane/article/view/8.
Jarvinen, Margaretha. 2020. “Symbolic Interactionism as Analytical Tradition.” In . SAGE Publications Ltd.
Jarvinen, Margaretha, and Nanna Mik-Meyer. 2020. Qualitative Analysis, Eight Approaches for the Social Sciences. First Edit. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Lake, R.C., B. Boli, U. Djonda, and Y.N. Siwa. 2018. ‘Building Task Concepts of the Vernacular Settlement in Tamkesi Village’. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Vol. 213. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/213/1/012034.
Lake, Reginaldo Christophori. 2016. ‘Tata Spasial Arsitektur Tradisional Suku Atoni Di Kampung Tamkesi Pulau Timor’. ATRIUM - Jurnal Arsitektur. https://doi.org/10.21460/atvm.2016.21.3.
Martin, Geoffrey. 2005. All Possible Worlds; A History of Geographical Ideas.
Melnick, Robert Z. 1983. “Protecting Rural Cultural Landscapes: Finding Value in the Countryside.” Landscape Journal 2 (2): 85–96. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.2.2.85.
Mik-Meyer, Nanna. 2020. “Symbolic Interactionism, Stigma and Othering.” In . SAGE Publications Ltd.
Mulyana, D. 2001. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Neuman, W. Lawrence. 2013. Social Research Methods; Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Seventh Ed. Pearson Education Limited.
Plachter, Harald, and Mechtild Rössler. 1995. Cultural Landscapes: Reconnecting Culture and Nature in Cultural Landscapes of Universal Value: Components of a Global Strategy. University of Michigan: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
Pradono, Budi. 2019. ‘The Interiority of Proximity Between Nature and Architecture in Contemporary and Tropically Context with Cases Studies’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 3 (2): 129–44. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v3i2.63.
Purbadi, Yohanes Djarot, Achmad Djunaedi, and Sudaryono. 2019. ‘Kearifan Kaenbaun Sebagai Dasar Konseptual Pada Tata Spasial Arsitektur Permukiman Suku Dawan Di Desa Kaenbaun’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 3 (2): 215–38. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v3i2.71.
Salura, Purnama, Stephanie Clarissa, and Reginaldo Christophori Lake. 2020. ‘The Application of Sundanese Vernacular Concept to The Design of Modern Building-Case Study: Aula Barat (West Hall) of Bandung Institute of Technology, West Java, Indonesia’. Journal of Design and Built Environment. Vol. 20.
Tarigan, Riandy. 2023. ‘Modernity vs Traditionality: The Approach the Vernacular Architecture in Maintaining Traditional Architecture through Structuralism’. Archimane 1 (1): 1–10. https://journal.gioarchitect.co.id/index.php/archimane/article/view/1/1.
Taylor, Ken. 2012. Managing Cultural Landscapes. Managing Cultural Landscapes. London & New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203128190.
Thomas, W.I., and D.S. Thomas. 1928. The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. New York: Knopf.
Veeger, KJ. 1993. Realitas Sosial, Refleksi Filsafat Sosial Atas Hubungan Individu - Masyarakat Dalam Cakrawala Sejarah Sosiologi. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Widodo, Johannes. 2019. ‘Human, Nature, And Architecture’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 3 (2): 145–48. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v3i2.65.
Wolcott, H. F. 1999. Ethnography: A Way of Seeing. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
Wylie, J. 2007. Landscape. London & New York: Routledge.