Penerapan sakralitas pada arsitektur Vihara - Museum Buddha

Penulis

  • Singgih Salim Master of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan , Magister Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan
  • Rahadhian Prajudi Herwindo Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan , Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3756-3707 (tidak diautentikasi)
  • Yuswadi Saliya Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan , Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v7i1.1087
Crossmark

Kata Kunci:

Kontekstualitas, Sakralitas, Vihara - museum

Abstrak

Agama Buddha merupakan salah satu agama yang sudah cukup tua di dunia. Seiring perkembangan agama Buddha ke penjuru dunia, terjadi perubahan tipologi arsitektur Buddha menjadi semakin kompleks akibat tidak adanya sastra arsitektural yang mengatur dengan penambahan fungsi-fungsi pendukung untuk meningkatkan pendidikan terhadap umat Buddha. Meskipun demikian, penambahan fungsi profan dapat melemahkan nilai sakralitas pada kesatuan kompleks ibadah apabila keliru dalam menyikapi desain arsitekturnya dan mengganggu kegiatan ritual di dalamnya, Salah satu fungsi yang dapat memberikan pendidikan sekaligus pendekatan personal terhadap agama Buddha adalah museum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mempelajari hubungan kontekstualitas antara fungsi utama sakral (bangunan ibadah) dan fungsi pendukung profan (museum) dalam kesatuan kompleks vihara dalam menampilkan nilai sakralitas melalui karakteristik arsitektur. Analisis menggunakan teori sakralitas, dan teori kontekstualitas yang dielaborasikan dalam berbagai lingkup arsitektur untuk menghasilkan hubungan karakteristik arsitektur vihara dan museum yang menerapkan nilai sakralitas sesuai filosofi Buddha. Penelitian ini mengarahkan pada perbedaan penerapan prinsip orientasi, hierarki, penjaga batas, bentuk geometris, simetris, repetisi, tampilan material, sinergi bentuk, pembagian zonasi, prosesi, ambiguitas atmosfer, obyek simbolis, penjaga batas, dan area berkumpul.

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

Acri, Andrea, ed. 2016. Esoteric Buddhism in Mediaeval Maritime Asia: Networks of Masters, Texts, Icons. Singapore: ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute.

Barrie, Thomas. 2013. The Sacred In-between: The Mediating Roles of Architecture. The Sacred In-Between: The Mediating Roles of Architecture. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315881119.

Brolin, Brent C. 1980. Architecture in Context: Fitting New Buildings with Old. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Cahyawan; Yuswadi Saliya, Meidy Charista. 2017. ‘Similarities and Differences in the Spatial Pattern and Form of Buddhist Buildings of Worship on Bali’. Riset Arsitektur (RISA) 1 (04): 413–26. https://doi.org/10.26593/risa.v1i04.2758.413-426.

Carrier, David. 2006. Museum Skepticism: A History of the Display of Art in Public Galleries. Durham, London: Duke University Press. https://is.muni.cz/el/1421/jaro2016/ESB070/um/61694259/David_Carrier_Art_Museum_Narratives.pdf.

Cianca, Jenn. 2018. Sacred Ritual, Profane Space: The Roman House as Early Christian Meeting Place. 3rd ed. Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Çizgen, Gültekin. 2012. ‘Rethinking The Role of Context and Contextualism in Architecture and Design’. Eastern Mediterranean University. http://i-rep.emu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11129/348/Cizgen.pdf?sequence=1.

Durkheim, Émile. 2001. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Eliade, Mircea. 1987. The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. Edited by Willard R. Trask. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. https://monoskop.org/images/b/b1/Eliade_Mircea_The_Sacred_and_The_profane_1963.pdf.

Goldberger, Paul. 2003. ‘Architecture, Museums and Authenticity’. Lectures Paulgoldberger. 2003. https://www.paulgoldberger.com/lectures/architecture-museums-and-authenticity/.

Herwindo, Rahadhian Prajudi, and Elfan Kedmon. 2009. ‘Penggalian Potensi Desain Candi Dan Aplikasinya Dalam Arsitektur Pasca Hindu-Budha Di Jawa : Membangun Jati Diri Yang Bersumber Pada Khasanah Budaya Lokal’. Bandung. https://repository.unpar.ac.id/handle/123456789/4064.

Hoffman, Douglas, and Michael J. Crosbie. 2010. Seeking the Sacred in Contemporary Religious Architecture. 1st ed. Ohio: The Kent State University Press.

Jayawardana, Priyantha. 2001. ‘Physical Aspects of Buddhist Sacred Place in Congested Urban Context: Examination of Contemporary Buddhist Architecture in Western Province’. University of Moratuwa. http://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/10205.

Jones, Lindsay. 1993. ‘The Hermeneutics of Sacred Architecture: A Reassessment of the Similitude between Tula, Hidalgo and Chichen Itza, Yucatan, Part II’. History of Religions 32 (4): 315–42.

Karim, Khairulnizam Mat, and Mohd Anuar Awang Idris. 2013. ‘Epistemologi Menurut Perspektif Agama Budha: Satu Huraian Awal’. Jurnal Kolej Islam Pahang Sultan Ahmad Shah (KIPSAS) 13: 46–59. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Khairulnizam-Karim/publication/260038834_Epistemologi_Menurut_Perspektif_Agama_Buddha_Satu_Huraian_Awal_Epistemology_From_The_Buddhism_Perspective_A_Preliminary/links/00b4952f32d34d8180000000/Epistemologi-Menurut-Persp.

Maranda, Lymn. 2018. ‘Museology and the Sacred’. In Museology and the Sacred, edited by François Mairesse, 118. Tehran, Iran: ICOFOM. https://icofom.mini.icom.museum/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/2018/12/Icofom_mono_Sacred_version_nume__rique2.pdf.

Minucciani, Valeria. 2013. ‘Considerations in Relation to the Museography for Objects of a Religious Nature’. In Religion and Museums: Immaterial and Material Heritage, edited by Valeria Minucciani. Torino, Italy: Umberto Allemandi & C. https://www.frh-europe.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Religion-and-Museums.pdf.

Nöth, Winfried. 1990. Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

Paine, Crispin. 2013. Religious Objects in Museums: Private Lives and Public Duties. 1st ed. England, UK: Routledge.

Paramitha, Nadya Wicitra. 2019. ‘Makna Sakral Pada Konfigurasi Arsitektur Masjid’. Universitas Katolik Parahyangan. https://repository.unpar.ac.id/handle/123456789/9870.

Plate, S. Brent. 2017. ‘Getting Religion in the Museum’. Sacred Matters. 2017. https://sacredmattersmagazine.com/getting-religion-in-the-museum/.

Salura, Purnama, Bachtiar Fauzy, and Rudy Trisno. 2015. ‘Relasi Liturgi Dengan Ekspresi Bentuk Sakral Arsitektur Gereja Katolik’. Bandung.

Schumacher, Thomas L. 1996. ‘Contextualism: Urban Ideals and Deformations’. In Theorizing a New Agenda for Architecture: An Anthology of Architectural Theory, 1965-1995, edited by Kate Nesbitt. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

Smith, Jonathan Z. 1992. To Take Place: Toward Theory in Ritual. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Varley, Helen. 2011. The Buddha and His Teachings. Leicestershire: Anness Publishing.

Wecker, Menachem. 2014. ‘When Religious Art Is Displayed, Secular Museums May Become Sacred Spaces’. DeseretNews. 2014. https://www.deseret.com/2014/1/3/20532382/when-religious-art-is-displayed-secular-museums-may-become-sacred-spaces#someone-drawing-religious-sculptures-at-the-art-institute-of-chicago.

Wenli, Zhang. 2018. ‘The Sacred: A Museum or a Temple’. In Museology and the Sacred, edited by François Mairesse, 234. Tehran, Iran: ICOFOM. https://icofom.mini.icom.museum/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/2018/12/Icofom_mono_Sacred_version_nume__rique2.pdf.

William Penn Foundation. 2007. Sense of Place: Design Guidelines for New Construction in Historic Districts. Philadelphia: Preservation Alliance for Greater Philadelphia. http://www.preservationalliance.com/publications/SenseofPlace_final.pdf.

Diterbitkan

2022-05-14

Cara Mengutip

“Penerapan Sakralitas Pada Arsitektur Vihara - Museum Buddha”. 2022. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 7 (1): 11-22. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v7i1.1087.

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama