The impact of housing transformation to livability in North Bandung Peri-urban area
Main Article Content
Abstract
Urbanization is an undeniable phenomenon that happens globally, including in Indonesia. Indonesian cities are growing, causing urban sprawl and transformation of rural areas into urban areas. In between the urban and rural there is peri-urban area that has unique mixed characteristics of both. Areas with such characteristics can be found easily in the outskirts of Bandung city. The growth of peri-urban areas in Bandung occurs simultaneously with the growing tourism industries. This phenomenon caused a spatial transformation especially to the existing houses, which gives impacts to the livability of the area. This article would focus upon how housing transformation in peri-urban areas can affect the livability of the area by using the North Bandung peri-urban area as a case study. The result shows that the spatial transformation that happens in peri-urban areas gives positive impacts to social, economy, and spatial aspects, but unfortunately not the environmental aspects.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kota Bandung. 2017. ‘Laporan Akhir Penelitian Survey Index Liveable City’. Bandung.
Budiyantini, Yanti, and Vidya Pratiwi. 2016. ‘Peri-Urban Typology of Bandung Metropolitan Area’. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 227 (July): 833–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.152.
Flynn, Andrew, Li Yu, Peter Feindt, and Chun Chen. 2016. ‘Eco-Cities, Governance and Sustainable Lifestyles: The Case of the Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-City’. Habitat International 53 (78–86). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.004.
Gubernur Jawa Barat. 2010. Peraturan Daerah Nomor 22 Tahun 2010 Tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Provinsi Jawa Barat Tahun 2009-2029. Indonesia. http://bappeda.jabarprov.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Perda-No-22-Tahun-2010-Tentang-RTRWP-Jawa-Barat-2009-2029.pdf.
Kihl, Mary, Dean Brennan, Neha Gabhawala, Jacqueline List, and Parul Mittal. 2005. Livable Communities: An Evaluation Guide. Washington DC: AARP Public Policy Institute.
Kontgis, Caitlin, Annemarie Schneider, Jefferson Fox, Sumeet Saksena, James H. Spencer, and Miguel Castrence. 2014. ‘Monitoring Peri-Urbanization in the Greater Ho Chi Minh City Metropolitan Area’. Applied Geography 53 (September): 377–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.06.029.
Laquinta, David L, and Axel W. Drescher. 2000. ‘Defining the Peri-Urban: Rural-Urban Linkages and Institutional Connections’. Land Reform, Land Settlement and Cooperatives 2000 (2): 8–26. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20013046357.
Meriam-Webster. 2020. ‘Meriam-Webster Dictionary’. Merriam-Webster.Com. 2020. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/liveability.
Monocle. 2019. ‘The Monocle Quality of Life Survey’. Monocle. 2019.
Okulicz-Kozaryn, Adam. 2013. ‘City Life: Rankings (Livability) Versus Perceptions (Satisfaction)’. Social Indicators Research 110 (2): 433–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9939-x.
Phillis, Yannis A., Vassilis S. Kouikoglou, and Catalina Verdugo. 2017. ‘Urban Sustainability Assessment and Ranking of Cities’. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 64 (July): 254–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.03.002.
Prasetyo, Eko Bagus, Andrew Cokro Putra, Bima Rahmaputra, and Agus Suharjono Ekomadyo. 2020. ‘Architectural Adaptation Strategy of Shophouses in Jalan Tubagus Ismail, Bandung’. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 5 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v5i1.72.
Ruth, Matthias, and Rachel S. Franklin. 2014. ‘Livability for All? Conceptual Limits and Practical Implications’. Applied Geography 49 (May): 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.018.
Sanders, Peter, Mark Zuidgeest, and Karst Geurs. 2015. ‘Liveable Streets in Hanoi: A Principal Component Analysis’. Habitat International 49: 547–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.07.001.
Shita, Galuh. 2017. ‘Indikator Kota Layak Huni’. Handal Selasar Group. 2017. https://www.handalselaras.com/seberapa-layak-huni-kota-kota-di-indonesia/.
Sim, David. 2019. ‘Nine Criteria for Liveable Urban Density’. In Soft City: Building Density for Everyday Life, edited by David Sim, 604–64. Washington DC: Gehl Architects Finance & Administration.
Simon, David, and Andrew Adam-Bradford. 2016. ‘Archaeology and Contemporary Dynamics for More Sustainable, Resilient Cities in the Peri-Urban Interface’. In Balance Urban Development: Options and Strategies for Liveable Cities, edited by Basant Maheshwari, Vijay P. Singh, and Bhadranie Thoradeniya, 57–83. Sydney: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28112-4_5.
The Economist Intelligence Unit. 2019. The Global Liveability Index 2019. London: The Economist. https://www.eiu.com/n/the-global-liveability-index-2019/.
Wang, Yong, Qian Ding, and Dafang Zhuang. 2015. ‘An Eco-City Evaluation Method Based on Spatial Analysis Technology: A Case Study of Jiangsu Province, China’. Ecological Indicators 58: 37–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.032.
World Bank. 2016. ‘Indonesia’s Urban Story’. Worldbank.Org. 2016. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2016/06/14/indonesia-urban-story.
Yu, Li. 2014. ‘Low Carbon Eco-City: New Approach for Chinese Urbanisation’. Habitat International 44: 102–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.05.004.
Zanella, A., A. S. Camanho, and T. G. Dias. 2015. ‘The Assessment of Cities’ Livability Integrating Human Wellbeing and Environmental Impact’. Annals of Operations Research 226 (1): 695–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1666-7.